Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Short

Utrecht revokes professor’s doctoral degree

Utrecht revokes professor’s doctoral degree

 

 

A 2008 medical dissertation, consisting largely of previously published scientific articles, has fallen into dispute. Two articles have been withdrawn and two others are subject to an ‘expression of concern’, writes the Utrecht university newspaper DUB (in Dutch). The author in question allegedly manipulated and fabricated data. As a result, Utrecht University has revoked the PhD title of this ‘outside PhD student’ (someone who is not employed while pursuing a PhD). This person says he has been working as a full professor for years and feels offended by the complaints about his dissertation.

 

In August 2020, the Utrecht Board heard of possible problems, says an anonymised statement from the Utrecht Committee for Scientific Integrity. The raw data on which the then PhD candidate allegedly based his articles can no longer be retrieved. They were not stored electronically and there was no need to do so at the time, is the defence. Nevertheless, a formal complaint against the researcher followed almost a year later.

 

The accused, by the way, questioned the motives of the complainant, alleging a personal grudge against him. But the university is not convinced. The board is returning the PhD bonus of 93 thousand euros to the Ministry of Education, says a statement. ‘We have also wondered how this could have happened”, rector Henk Kummeling said in it. “We don’t want to have this kind of unsound promotion. Not in any discipline.” (HOP, BB)

 

Editor in chief Saskia Bonger

Do you have a question or comment about this article?

s.m.bonger@tudelft.nl

Comments are closed.