Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Education
Unlawful

Preferential policy for female first years at AE not permitted

The Faculty of Aerospace Engineering has been notified by the Inspectorate of Education that the preferential policy for female freshmen that was supposed to take effect next academic year is not allowed by law.

(Photo: Thijs van Reeuwijk)

On Thursday afternoon 14 March, the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering (AE) informed all staff members, students and prospective students that the preferential policy for female first year students will not go ahead as planned. The Faculty had intended to select 30% female students from this academic year onwards. The average percentage of female students admitted usually is under 20%. To address this imbalance, the Faculty took the decision at the start of 2024 to introduce a preferential policy.

However, the Faculty reports that the Inspectorate of Education informed TU Delft by email and telephone that this would contravene the Higher Education and Research Act. A spokesperson at the Inspectorate confirms this. The Inspectorate came into action after media coverage of the controversial plan to introduce a women’s quota, he says. “We then looked into it and came to the conclusion that the law does not permit preference either being given or denied to certain groups.”

Discussion in society

The spokesperson goes on to say that the Inspectorate understands AE’s need to create a greater gender balance in the degree programme. “The question is what measures may you take.” He believes that the commotion (in Dutch) that the AE’s plan brought about when it was made known shows that a societal discussion on the subject first needs to take place and then, if need be, the law changed before a gender preference policy can be introduced.

AE announced that it will still ‘continue working towards a more inclusive and diverse learning environment for our students’. A TU Delft spokesperson wrote that ‘We will shortly contact the Ministry to discuss what we can do to promote equal opportunities in higher education’.

Disappointed

The Director of Education at AE, Joris Melkert, is disappointed that his plan has to be shelved. “We have spent years thinking about how to increase the number of women.” In an interview in the Volkskrant newspaper, Melkert said (in Dutch) that TU Delft lawyers had determined that a preferential policy would be permitted. He now says that the Legal Department ‘still sees options’ to address the situation. This may involve taking action in regulations for experiments.

This will have no impact on the students who have applied for the 2024-2025 academic year. They will be subject to the current selection rules.

In the meantime, Melkert is hoping for the new Cabinet to bring about change. He refers to a letter to the House of Representatives from the outgoing Minister of Education, Robbert Dijkgraaf, who wrote: ‘Whether we permit a preferential policy in the selection criteria and what this entails in the future is up to the new Cabinet.’

Editor in chief Saskia Bonger

Do you have a question or comment about this article?

s.m.bonger@tudelft.nl

Comments are closed.