Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Erasmus University loses lawsuit over excessive tuition fees

The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of former part-time students of Erasmus University Rotterdam in a lawsuit over excessive tuition fees. They paid around EUR 34,000 for their two-year Master’s in Business Administration, even though their programme was Government funded. Officially, the university was only allowed to charge the statutory tuition fee.

This issue has been a topic of debate since 2018. At the time, a compensation scheme was introduced, but not everyone qualified for it or accepted the offer. The Supreme Court lawsuit was filed by a group of 133 former students.

Previous court rulings went against the students, but the Supreme Court now states that the Court of Appeal ignored key arguments. The students argued, for instance, that they were misinformed – had they received the correct information, they would have chosen the much cheaper regular Master’s programme. Moreover, the Supreme Court ruled that the programme wrongly charged extra costs which, according to the Education Inspectorate, is not allowed.

The case has been referred to the Amsterdam Court of Appeal for a new ruling. The financial impact on the university could reach up to EUR 4 million, plus potential compensation claims. The university says it is reviewing the ruling.

Bas Belleman

Comments are closed.