Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Short

DUO wrongfully refused supplementary grant

DUO wrongfully refused supplementary grant

 

 

A student broke off all ties with her father and applied to the student funding agency DUO for a supplementary grant. But it was denied. To the judge’s annoyance, DUO barely showed any interest in her situation.

 

Normally, students receive some financial support from their parents. This student did not, at least not from her father. He had even cheated her several times, she told the agency.

 

In principle, DUO looks at the income of the parents when deciding on an additional grant. However, if students have a serious conflict with their parents, they can ask DUO to disregard their parents’ income. This is what this student did.

 

DUO did not go along with it. This can happen, but the judge believes (in Dutch) that in this case the organisation had failed. DUO should have supervised the student better and should have asked more questions when she did not provide enough information.

 

It remains to be seen whether she will receive a supplementary grant after all. DUO has eight weeks in which to take a new decision, with this verdict in mind. In the meantime, the student will be reimbursed for the legal costs. (HOP, BB)

 

Editor in chief Saskia Bonger

Do you have a question or comment about this article?

s.m.bonger@tudelft.nl

Comments are closed.