Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Science

Are molten salt nuclear reactors safer and cleaner?

Amid 21st century energy concerns, TU Delft is leading a four-year programme to examine and validate the safety and waste principles of molten salt reactors, a potentially cleaner and safer source of nuclear energy.

SAMOFAR (Safety Assessment of the Molten Salt Fast Reactor) is a €5 million European Union programme involving 11 partners from both science and industry. Lead researcher and Professor of Nuclear Reactor Physics at TU Delft, Jan-Leen Kloosterman, explained the advantages of molten salt reactors over the currently used solid fuel reactors: “In solid fuel reactors, the fuel rods are cooled from the outside, but the disadvantage is that if an accident happens and you can’t cool the fuel, it could melt releasing radioactive fission products. In molten salt reactors, the uranium and thorium fuel is dissolved in the coolant so it’s one medium and therefore you never have the problem of melting fuel and release of fission products.”

Molten salt reactors are built a bit like a bath with a drain and a ‘plug’ at the bottom. “The so-called ‘freeze plug’ is solid salt cooled from the outside,” said Kloosterman. “So if the power fails, for example because of a tsunami like we saw in Fukushima, cooling stops and the freeze plug melts due to the heat from the reactor core, allowing the fuel to flow into the safety-tanks underneath the reactor core.”

Molten salt nuclear technology has been around since the 1960s; but it was soon superseded by fast-breeder nuclear reactors fuelled with uranium and plutonium. However concerns about the health and environmental effects of nuclear fission by-product, plutonium, as well as its potential to be used in nuclear weapons, has got people thinking about molten salt reactors again.

The SAMOFAR programme will concentrate on molten salt reactors using thorium, a relatively cheap and abundant fuel: “And if you use thorium, you don’t produce plutonium which needs to be safely stored for hundreds of thousands of years,” explained Kloosterman.

It will be at least 25 years before there is an operational molten salt reactor in Europe, estimates Kloosterman, but the programme aims to have a large-scale demonstration facility by 2025. “In the meantime, the main purpose of SAMOFAR is to prove that all these safety-related principles really work in the experimental facilities.”

Editor Redactie

Do you have a question or comment about this article?

delta@tudelft.nl

Comments are closed.