Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Opinion

[Column] Tim de Z.

Did Professor Tim de Zeeuw really do very bad things that justify harsh sanctions? If so, Dap Hartmann says it’s in everyone’s interest that this is made explicit.

(Photo: Sam Rentmeester)

“He is not welcome at this university ever again,” said Leiden Executive Board President Annetje Ottow last year about the discredited Professor of Astronomy Tim de Zeeuw. Other institutes also declared him persona non grata, including the ESO (European Southern Observatory), the prestigious European organisation of which he was Director General from 2007 to 2017. The Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences kicked him out of its advisory board.

What did Tim de Zeeuw do to be punished so harshly? Did he rape or kill someone? Has he committed large-scale fraud involving money or scientific results? According to the local Leidsch Dagblad newspaper, he was ‘dirty and scary’. De Volkskrant newspaper mentioned ‘decades of transgressive behaviour’ and recalled an incident that I would characterise as an unusual sense of humour: you couldn’t just congratulate him on his birthday, you first had to earn that right. All the rest were unspecified allegations such as ‘sexual harassment’ and ‘unwanted physical contact’. The Leiden University Executive Board spoke of ‘abuse of power, gender discrimination, and systematically vilifying and belittling employees’. That sounds pretty bad and is obviously cause for concern. The fact that this has been going on for ‘decades’ is no excuse for that behaviour, but it proves that administrators knew about and tolerated it all those years. And now those same administrators are suddenly rushing to safety by persecuting miscreants whose behaviour they have condoned for decades. A hasty about-face to save your own face.

A hasty about-face to save your own face

Until the shit hit the fan, Tim de Zeeuw had a glorious scientific career and was regarded as one of the two most brilliant Dutch astronomers of the past 40 years. That other brilliant astronomer is his wife, Ewine van Dishoeck. Both graduated cum laude on the same day in 1984. After obtaining his PhD, Tim was employed by the Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton, where geniuses such as Albert Einstein, John von Neumann and Kurt Gödel preceded him. When I visited him there as a student in 1985, he was riding the old bicycle of Martin Schwarzschild who worked at Princeton University on numerical models of triaxial elliptical galaxies which Tim had theoretically analysed in his PhD thesis.

Perhaps Tim de Zeeuw really did do some very bad things that justify these harsh sanctions. It is in everyone’s best interest that this is made explicit. When a rapist or murderer is convicted, we know exactly what he has done and we can judge whether the sentence is proportionate to the crime. In the case of Tim de Zeeuw, nothing has been revealed that justifies this severe punishment. I find that unsavoury, not least because it surmises that your career may be in serious jeopardy if people find you ‘dirty and scary’. In our civilised society even rapists and murderers deserve a second chance. Is it then okay to retaliate Tim de Zeeuw’s objectionable behaviour by destroying his career?

And Dennis Wiersma saw that it was good.

Dap Hartmann is Associate Professor of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at the Delft Centre for Entrepreneurship (DCE) at the Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management. In a previous life, he was an astronomer and worked at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Together with conductor and composer Reinbert de Leeuw, he wrote a book about modern (classical) music.

Columnist Dap Hartmann

Do you have a question or comment about this article?

l.hartmann@tudelft.nl

Comments are closed.