Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Short

Unconventional coastal protection proposal

Unconventional coastal protection proposal

 

 

TU Delft, HKV lijn in water and RoyalHaskoning DHV have presented a new plan to protect the southwest of the Netherlands against sea level rise. 

 

Impression of the Holland barrier at Hoek van Holland. (Illustration: Ties Rijcken and Koen Meijman)

 

The conventional approach would mean significant dike reinforcements for the entire area between Biesbosch and Hoek van Holland. For a sea level rise of 50 centimetres, that would have to cost about EUR 3 billion. The newly presented alternative is a second storm surge barrier, the ‘Holland barrier’, which should be built in front of the current Maeslant barrier at Hoek van Holland. The Holland barrier would also require three super pumping stations to discharge river water. Among other things, the plan would safeguard Rotterdam from higher sea dykes.

 

“The question is at what sea level rise will this become the cheaper option”, says TU Delft researcher and publicist dr.ir. Ties Rijcken. “We would like to investigate that further.” The plan was published in the Dutch newspaper NRC (in Dutch) on 12 October called ‘We moeten ons juist niet terugtrekken voor de stijgende zeespiegel.’ (‘We should not retreat in the face of rising sea levels’.)

 

Even more than the Maeslant barrier, when it closes once a year, the Holland barrier is a potential tourist attraction. Because when the barrier is up, which it will be most of the time, visitors can take a lift along the edge of the arch to the terrace on top. This offers a unique view of coast, dunes and waterworks. (JW)

 

Editor in chief Saskia Bonger

Do you have a question or comment about this article?

s.m.bonger@tudelft.nl

Comments are closed.